TIMKEN-DETROIT AXLE CO. v. EATON AXLE & SPRING CO.

No. 2503.

56 F.2d 651 (1931)

TIMKEN-DETROIT AXLE CO. v. EATON AXLE & SPRING CO.

District Court, N. D. Ohio, E. D.

September 17, 1931.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richey & Watts, of Cleveland, Ohio, for plaintiff.

Kwis, Hudson & Kent, of Cleveland, Ohio, for defendant.


JONES, District Judge.

It is well understood that the master's report is advisory, under the terms of the reference. The conclusions reached are those of the court.

The defendant's exceptions are largely directed to the master's finding that the second patent application was a continuing application in relation to the first, and to the findings and conclusions of the master as to the validity of the patent in suit over the prior art. Exceptions, of course...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases