NAIVETTE v. PHILAD CO.

No. 5794.

54 F.2d 623 (1931)

NAIVETTE, Inc., v. PHILAD CO. et al.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

May 15, 1931.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Marston Allen, of Cincinnati, Ohio (Pennie, Davis, Marvin & Edmonds, of New York City, Kwis, Hudson & Kent, of Cleveland, Ohio, and W. Brown Morton and E. H. Merchant, both of New York City, on the brief), for appellant.

Morris Kirschstein, of New York City (Harvey R. Hawgood, Hawgood & Van Horn, and T. Paul Titus, all of Cleveland, Ohio, on the brief), for appellees.

Before DENISON, HICKS, and HICKENLOOPER, Circuit Judges.


PER CURIAM.

Appellees brought in the court below against appellant the usual suit for patent infringement. Appellant answered denying validity and infringement; and continued its answer with several paragraphs stating a counterclaim based on unfair competition by the plaintiff against the defendant. This answer concluded with a paragraph praying that the bill be dismissed, that an injunction be issued against plaintiffs to restrain this unfair competition, and that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases