BARRETT CO. v. SELDEN CO.

No. 1781.

48 F.2d 620 (1931)

BARRETT CO. v. SELDEN CO.

District Court, W. D. Pennsylvania.

March 27, 1931.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

R. T. M. McCready, of Pittsburgh, Pa., and Pennie, Davis, Marvin & Edmonds, W. B. Morton, and R. B. Canfield, all of New York City, for plaintiff.

Alter, Wright & Barron, George E. Alter, and R. A. Norton, all of Pittsburgh, Pa., and Newell & Spencer, of New York City, for defendant.


GIBSON, District Judge.

On February 27, 1929, by opinion filed in this court, plaintiff's patent was held to be valid and infringed. 32 F.2d 360. Upon motion for rehearing, the testimony was reviewed and given further consideration; the motion being denied. An opinion was filed with the order, which set forth the reasons therefor. 48 F.2d 619. The case was thereupon taken to the Circuit Court of Appeals...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases