GRAIN KING MFG. CO. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE.

No. 39.

47 F.2d 608 (1931)

GRAIN KING MFG. CO. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

February 2, 1931.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lord, Day & Lord, of New York City (Bernhard Knollenberg, of New York City, of counsel), for appellant.

G. A. Youngquist, Asst. Atty. Gen., Sewall Key and Norman D. Keller, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen., and John MacC. Hudson, of Washington, D. C. (C. M. Charest, Gen. Counsel, Bureau of Internal Revenue, and Prew Savoy, Sp. Atty., Bureau of Internal Revenue, both of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for appellee.

Before L. HAND, SWAN, and CHASE, Circuit Judges.


PER CURIAM.

The petitioner in this case is a Minnesota corporation having its principal office at St. Paul, Minn. The petition by consent was filed in this court. The only lawful place in which the petitioner could file a return was at St. Paul. Section 992(b), title 26, U. S. Code, 26 USCA § 992(b). Under section 1225(b), title 26, U. S. Code (26 USCA § 1225(b), the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit was the only proper court in which to file...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases