KINGHORN v. PENNSYLVANIA R. CO.

Nos. 211, 212.

47 F.2d 588 (1931)

KINGHORN v. PENNSYLVANIA R. CO. (two cases).

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

February 16, 1931.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Burlingham, Veeder, Fearey, Clark & Hupper, of New York City (M. L. Fearey and G. F. Tinker, both of New York City, of counsel), for appellant.

Arthur Butler Graham, of New York City (H. Walter Reynolds and Frederick M. Schlater, both of New York City, of counsel), for appellee.

Before L. HAND, AUGUSTUS N. HAND, and CHASE, Circuit Judges.


CHASE, Circuit Judge (after stating the facts as above).

Since the jury found for the plaintiff in both cases, we should resolve conflicts in the evidence in the light most favorable to him and accept as established all the essential facts which the plaintiff's evidence, if not contradicted, would fairly prove to be true. In doing so, we must come quickly to the conclusion that the engine did not signal with bell or whistle until just before the collision and when...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases