1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 46 F.2d
  5. 46 F.2d 575 (1931)
 

IN RE COLE

No. 2556.

46 F.2d 575 (1931)

In re COLE et al.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

January 21, 1931.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Frank B. Fox and Fraley & Paul, all of Philadelphia, Pa. (Sturtevant & Mason, of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for appellants.

T. A. Hostetler, of Washington, D. C. (Howard S. Miller, of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for Commissioner of Patents.

Before GRAHAM, Presiding Judge, and BLAND, HATFIELD, GARRETT, and LENROOT, Associate Judges.

GARRETT, Associate Judge.

Three of the four claims here involved (Nos. 21, 22, and 24), are method claims relating to "Improvements in tire molds and their manufacture." The fourth, No. 26, is for the article.

All were disallowed by the examiner, whose decision was affirmed by the Board of Appeals. Appeal was then taken to this court.

Claims 21, 22, and 24 read as follows:

"21. The method of forming a tire mold side piece of laterally hollowed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases