CHERRY v. HOWELL

No. 4638.

4 F.Supp. 597 (1931)

CHERRY et al. v. HOWELL et al.

District Court, E. D. New York.

August 31, 1931.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ernst, Fox & Cane, of New York City (Jerome Michael, Melville H. Cane, and Jacob N. Robins, all of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiffs.

Clarke, Allen, Harper & Matthews, of New York City (Harold Harper, of New York City, of counsel), for defendant Clark Howell.


CAMPBELL, District Judge.

This is a motion made by the defendant Clark Howell, the only defendant served, for an order dismissing the complaint herein, upon the ground that said complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.

The action is stated to be brought by the plaintiffs on behalf of themselves and of all others similarly situated who shall come in as parties plaintiff and contribute to the expense of the suit.

The...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases