IN RE MURRAY

Patent Appeal No. 2796.

53 F.2d 540 (1931)

In re MURRAY et al.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

December 7, 1931.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Milans & Milans, of Washington, D. C. (Usina & Rauber, of New York City, of counsel), for appellants.

T. A. Hostetler, of Washington, D. C. (Howard S. Miller, of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for the Commissioner of Patents.

Before GRAHAM, Presiding Judge, and BLAND, HATFIELD, GARRETT, and LENROOT, Associate Judges.


LENROOT, Associate Judge.

This is an appeal from a decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office, affirming that of the examiner, rejecting, for want of invention over the prior art, claims 5, 20, 22, 26, and 27 of appellant's application, filed on December 4, 1923.

Of the claims on appeal, Nos. 5, 20, and 22 are representative and read as follows:

"5. A structure of the character described including in combination a bank of approximately...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases