SANTIS v. ESOLA

No. 6354.

50 F.2d 516 (1931)

SANTIS v. ESOLA.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

June 8, 1931.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph Edward Connolly, of San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.

George J. Hatfield, U. S. Atty., and Albert E. Bagshaw, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.

Before WILBUR and SAWTELLE, Circuit Judges, and NETERER, District Judge.


NETERER, District Judge (after stating the facts).

The judgment entered was an adjudication and pronouncement upon the subject-matter of the litigation between the United States and the defendant. The penalty to be assessed upon conviction was in the discretion of the court, but limited by statute to a maximum amount. And the exercise of the discretion and making pronouncement thereof by the court was a judicial act and final...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases