OWEN v. BRIEF ENGLISH SYSTEMS


54 F.2d 501 (1931)

OWEN v. BRIEF ENGLISH SYSTEMS, Inc., et al.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

December 7, 1931.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arthur A. Beaudry, of New York City (O. Ellery Edwards, of New York City, of counsel), for petitioner.

Hays, Podell & Shulman, of New York City, for respondents Brief English Systems, Inc., Emma B. Dearborn, and Hays, Podell & Shulman.

Kaufman & Weitzner, of New York City, for respondent Kingsport Press, Inc., and Kaufman & Weitzner.

Krause & Hirsch, of New York City, for Krause & Hirsch.

Benjamin Algase, of New York City, and Edgar M. Kitchin, of Washington, D. C., pro se.

Before MANTON, AUGUSTUS N. HAND, and CHASE, Circuit Judges.


AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judge.

This is a motion to punish the various respondents for contempt of this court upon the theory that they participated in sham and collusive suits.

We have discussed the material facts set forth upon this motion in our opinion on the appeal of John P. Owen in Kingsport Press, Inc., v. Brief English Systems, Inc., 54 F.2d 497, to be filed herewith. We there held that the suit by Edgar M. Kitchin...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases