1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 55 F.2d
  5. 55 F.2d 415 (1931)
 

UNITED STATES v. TUTHILL SPRING CO.

Nos. 36393, 35708.

55 F.2d 415 (1931)

UNITED STATES v. TUTHILL SPRING CO. TUTHILL SPRING CO. v. REINECKE, Collector of Internal Revenue.

District Court, N. D. Illinois, E. D.

December 21, 1931.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George E. Q. Johnson, U. S. Dist. Atty., of Chicago, Ill., C. M. Charest, Gen. Counsel, Bureau of Internal Revenue, of Washington, D. C., and Dwight H. Green and John P. Barnes, Asst. U. S. Attys., both of Chicago, Ill., and Frank J. Ready, Jr., of Washington, D. C., Sp. Atty., Bureau of Internal Revenue, for the United States and Mabel G. Reinecke, Collector.

Carl H. Weyl (of Elliott, Weyl & Jewett) and John Rabb Emison, both of Indianapolis, Ind., for Tuthill Spring Co.

WOODWARD, District Judge.

These two cases involve the application of the same principles of law. Hence, a single opinion will dispose of both cases.

The Tuthill Spring Company from March 25, 1919, to and including June 22, 1922, was engaged in the manufacture of leaf springs for replacement parts of automobiles. The Tuthill Spring Company designed and manufactured some 800-odd different sizes of types of springs called Titanic springs and designated each particular...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases