IN RE PITT

Patent Appeal No. 2634.

47 F.2d 393 (1931)

In re PITT.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

March 2, 1931.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Henry J. Lucke, of New York City (Paul A. Blair and J. H. Kilcoyne, both of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for appellant.

T. A. Hostetler, of Washington, D. C., for Commissioner of Patents.

Before GRAHAM, Presiding Judge, and BLAND, HATFIELD, GARRETT, and LENROOT, Associate Judges.


HATFIELD, Associate Judge.

This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals affirming the decision of the Primary Examiner denying claims 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, and 18 of appellant's application for an alleged invention relating to improvements in transmissions for automobiles or other motor-driven vehicles.

Claim 13 is illustrative. It reads:

"13. Centrifugally-controlled variable-speed gearing, comprising a driving member and a driven...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases