IN RE JOHNSON

Patent Appeal No. 2604.

47 F.2d 389 (1931)

In re JOHNSON et al.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

February 25, 1931.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Otto R. Barnett and Perceival H. Truman, both of Chicago, Ill., for appellants.

T. A. Hostetler, of Washington, D. C. (Howard S. Miller, of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for the Commissioner of Patents.

Before GRAHAM, Presiding Judge, and BLAND, HATFIELD, GARRETT, and LENROOT, Associate Judges.


BLAND, Associate Judge.

The subject-matter of this appeal is for certain improvements in mechanism for feeding sheets, particularly metal sheets, to a lithographing press. Some nine claims were allowed in the Patent Office, and four claims, which were broader in scope, were rejected by the primary examiner on the ground of lack of invention in view of three references:

Cameron, 1,283,659, November 5, 1918.

Conran, 1,301,799, April 22, 1919.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases