BISHOP v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE

No. 4517.

54 F.2d 298 (1931)

BISHOP v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

December 9, 1931.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles S. Cutting, Morris Glasser, and Charles Melvoin, all of Chicago, Ill., for petitioner.

G. A. Youngquist, Asst. Atty. Gen., and J. Louis Monarch and F. Edward Mitchell, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen. (C. M. Charest, Gen. Counsel, Bureau of Internal Revenue, and Nathan Gamimon, Sp. Atty., Bureau of Internal Revenue, both of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for respondent.

Before ALSCHULER, EVANS, and SPARKS, Circuit Judges.


SPARKS, Circuit Judge (after stating the facts as above).

The facts in this case are uncontroverted, and the sole question presented is whether the deficiencies added to petitioner's income were authorized by law.

The statutes involved are Revenue Act of 1921, c. 136, 42 Stat. 227, 233, 237:

"Sec. 210. That * * * there shall be levied, collected, and paid for each taxable year upon the net income of every individual a normal tax * * *.

"Sec...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases