1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 49 F.2d
  5. 49 F.2d 295 (1931)
 

CURTIS LIGHTING v. MUTUAL SUNSET LAMP MFG. CO.

No. 5404.

49 F.2d 295 (1931)

CURTIS LIGHTING, Inc., et al. v. MUTUAL SUNSET LAMP MFG. CO.

District Court, E. D. New York.

April 21, 1931.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dodson & Roe, of New York City, for plaintiffs.

C. P. Goepel, of New York City, for defendant.

BYERS, District Judge.

The defendant has appeared specially, filing a notice of motion "to test the jurisdiction of this court, upon the bill of complaint and exhibits," because (a) the action is not one arising under the patent laws, and (b) the bill of complaint alleges no facts showing that more than $3,000 is involved in the controversy.

The bill alleges that the plaintiffs are Illinois corporations, and that the defendant is a New York corporation having...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases