WIREBOUNDS PATENTS CO. et al
v.
SARANAC AUTOMATIC MACH. CO.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
April 17, 1931.
April 17, 1931.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Laurence A. Janney, of Chicago, Ill. (Emery, Booth, Janney & Varney, of Boston, Mass., and A. Trevor Jones, of Chicago, Ill., on the brief), for appellants.
Howard M. Cox, of Chicago, Ill., and A. C. Paul, of Minneapolis, Minn. (Cheever & Cox, of Chicago, Ill., on the brief), for appellee.
Before DENISON, MOORMAN, and HICKENLOOPER, Circuit Judges.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
PER CURIAM.
In our opinion, 37 F.2d 830, filed in this case we held that claim 25 of machine patent No. 1,128,145 was valid and infringed and that it was unnecessary to determine the validity or infringement of the method patent No. 1,128,252 or the workholder patent No. 1,128,144. We therefore directed that the decree of the District Court, 24 F.2d 872, be reversed, and the case remanded, with instructions...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
