MULHENS & KROPFF v. FERD. MUELHENS


48 F.2d 206 (1931)

MULHENS & KROPFF, Inc., v. FERD. MUELHENS, Inc.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

March 16, 1931.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Katz & Sommerich, of New York City, for the motion.

Manvel Whittemore, Lucius E. Varney, and Harold Harper, all of New York City, opposed.

Before MANTON, SWAN, and AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judges.


SWAN, Circuit Judge.

The mandate of this court issued during the present term. No action has yet been taken under it because a dispute has arisen between the parties concerning the decree to be entered, and the District Court is in doubt as to what the mandate, in the light of our opinion, directs. Under these circumstances the present motion is an appropriate procedure. We may either recall and amend the mandate, as was done...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases