1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 48 F.2d
  5. 48 F.2d 176 (1931)
 

CLAUDE NEON ELECTRICAL PRODUCTS v. BRILLIANT TUBE SIGN CO.

No. 6221.

48 F.2d 176 (1931)

CLAUDE NEON ELECTRICAL PRODUCTS, Inc., v. BRILLIANT TUBE SIGN CO. et al.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

March 23, 1931.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lyon & Lyon, of Los Angeles, Cal., William Bohleber, of New York City, Leonard S. Lyon and R. E. Caughey, both of Los Angeles, Cal., G. Wright Arnold, of Seattle, Wash., and Edwin J. Prindle, of New York City, for appellant.

Caldwell & Lycette, Hugh M. Caldwell, John P. Lycette, and Dean H. Eastman, all of Seattle, Wash., for appellees.

Before RUDKIN and WILBUR, Circuit Judges, and NORCROSS, District Judge.

RUDKIN, Circuit Judge.

This was a suit for infringement of letters patent No. 1,125,476, dated January 19, 1915, covering improvements in a system of illuminating by luminescent tubes. The plaintiff is the owner and holder of the exclusive right and license to manufacture, use, and sell the patented device, or devices, in certain western states, including the state of Washington. A later patent set forth in the complaint is not involved on the present appeal. The...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases