BRYDLE v. HONIGBAUM

Patent Appeal No. 2750.

54 F.2d 147 (1931)

BRYDLE v. HONIGBAUM.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

December 17, 1931.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles M. Thomas and Francis D. Thomas, both of Washington, D. C. (Arlon V. Cushman, of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for appellant.

Cornelius Zabriskie, of New York City, for appellee.

Before GRAHAM, Presiding Judge, and BLAND, HATFIELD, GARRETT, and LENROOT, Associate Judges.


GRAHAM, Presiding Judge.

In Brydle v. Honigbaum, 49 F.2d 963, 18 C. C. P. A. 1517, an opinion was filed in this case and an order entered reversing the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office and remanding the matter for further action by said office. In considering the case in the first instance, it became quite apparent to the court that to award priority on the counts of the interference, as framed by...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases