HATCH v. MOROSCO HOLDING CO.

No. 264.

50 F.2d 138 (1931)

HATCH v. MOROSCO HOLDING CO., Inc., et al.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

May 18, 1931.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ernst, Gale & Bernays, of New York City (Murray C. Bernays and Henry Gale, both of New York City, of counsel), for appellant.

George Z. Medalie, U. S. Atty., of New York City (Ernest Lappano, Asst. U. S. Atty., of New York City, C. M. Charest, Gen. Counsel, Bureau of Internal Revenue, of Washington, D. C., and Albert T. Clark, Sp. Atty., Bureau of Internal Revenue, of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for the United States.

Before MANTON, SWAN, and AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judges.


SWAN, Circuit Judge (after stating the facts as above).

The order appealed from allows the United States to prove as a claim against the receivership taxes assessed against Morosco Holding Company under section 280 of the Revenue Act of 1926 (44 Stat. 61 [26 USCA § 1069]), the validity of which this court sustained in Phillips v. Commissioner, 42 F.2d 177, pending on certiorari in the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases