CAFFEY, District Judge.
This case relates to taxes for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1919, under the Revenue Act of 1918 (40 Stat. 1057, c. 18).
There was a deficiency assessment, which was paid under protest. If plaintiff had been allowed a deduction which was claimed, the amount of additional tax would have been less. Recovery of the difference is sought.
The facts are few. Statement of them is confined to paragraph XIII of the complaint....
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.