IN RE KANE

No. 244.

48 F.2d 96 (1931)

In re KANE.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

March 16, 1931.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sydney H. Palmer, of Jamaica, N. Y., for creditor-appellant.

Harold L. Turk, of Brooklyn, N. Y., for bankrupt-appellant.

Garfield & Seligson, of New York City (M. V. Seligson and G. B. Garfield, both of New York City, of counsel), for creditor-respondent.

Before L. HAND, CHASE, and MACK, Circuit Judges.


MACK, Circuit Judge.

On petition of one Sondak, filed in the Supreme Court of the state of New York, appellant Kane was required to show cause why he should not be required to pay $3,060, with interest, alleged by the petition to have been delivered to him as petitioner's attorney, and to have been converted by him to his own use. On July 25, 1930, the order entered thereon granting the motion and directing the payment over of the money with interest recited that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases