1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 54 F.2d
  5. 54 F.2d 79 (1931)
 

MONARCH MARKING SYSTEM CO. v. A. KIMBALL CO.

No. 5247.

54 F.2d 79 (1931)

MONARCH MARKING SYSTEM CO. v. A. KIMBALL CO.

District Court, E. D. New York.

December 14, 1931.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Nathan, Bowman & Helferich, of New York City (Border Bowman, of New York City, and William R. Wood, of Cincinnati, Ohio, of counsel), for plaintiff.

Emery, Booth, Varney & Whittemore, of New York City (Lucius E. Varney and Nichol M. Sandoe, both of New York City, of counsel), for defendant.

CAMPBELL, District Judge.

This is a suit brought by the plaintiff to recover damages for and to restrain by injunction the continued alleged infringement of patent No. 1,130,614, issued to Frederick Kohnle, assignor, by mesne assignments, to the Monarch Tag Company, for price tag, and dated March 2, 1915; patent No. 1,197,037, issued to Frederick Kohnle, assignor, by mesne assignments, to the Monarch Tag Company, for printing and severing device for ticketing machines...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases