1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 52 F.2d
  5. 52 F.2d 1003 (1931)
 

WHITNEY BODDEN SHIPPING CO. v. UNITED STATES

No. K-357.

52 F.2d 1003 (1931)

WHITNEY BODDEN SHIPPING CO. v. UNITED STATES.

Court of Claims.

October 20, 1931.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George E. H. Goodner, of Washington, D. C., for plaintiff.

Charles R. Pollard, of Washington, D. C., and Charles B. Rugg, Asst. Atty. Gen. (D. Louis Bergeron, of Washington, D. C., on the brief), for the United States.

Before BOOTH, Chief Justice, and LITTLETON, WHALEY, WILLIAMS, and GREEN, Judges.

LITTLETON, Judge.

Plaintiff contends that the refund of $9,688.50 for the fiscal year ended May 31, 1918, was paid "pursuant to an additional assessment," as that term is used in section 1324 (a) of the Revenue Act of 1921, and that it is entitled to additional interest of $2,609.27 on the payments of $4,623.58 and $5,064.92 from June 16 and December 16, 1919, respectively, to March 15, 1924.

Before the enactment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases