BRAREN v. HORNER

Patent Appeal No. 2600.

49 F.2d 984 (1931)

BRAREN v. HORNER.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

May 27, 1931.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edward H. Cumpston, of Rochester, N. Y., for appellant.

Allen E. Peck, of Washington, D. C., for appellee.

Before GRAHAM, Presiding Judge and BLAND, HATFIELD, GARRETT, and LENROOT, Associate Judges.


GRAHAM, Presiding Judge.

A petition for rehearing has been filed herein, and the same is hereby denied. There seems to be no reason for a change in the views expressed by us in our opinion filed in this case on February 25, 1931. 47 F.2d 358.

It is argued that the court failed to pass upon this question: The Board of Appeals held that Braren was estopped from claiming that the invention in issue was a new and improved drive...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases