1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 48 F.2d
  5. 48 F.2d 970 (1931)
 

IN RE BACH

Patent Appeal No. 2707.

48 F.2d 970 (1931)

In re BACH.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

April 27, 1931.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Watts T. Estabrook, of Washington, D. C., and Hazard & Miller, of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.

T. A. Hostetler, of Washington, D. C. (Howard S. Miller, of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for Commissioner of Patents.

Before GRAHAM, Presiding Judge, and BLAND, HATFIELD, GARRETT, and LENROOT, Associate Judges.

LENROOT, Associate Judge.

This is an appeal from a decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office, affirming a decision of the Examiner, rejecting the claims of appellant's application, four in number, for failure to define invention over the prior art.

Upon the oral argument, claims 6 and 10 were withdrawn, leaving claims 11 and 12 before us for consideration. Claim 11 is illustrative and reads as follows:

"11. The method of making...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases