1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 49 F.2d
  5. 49 F.2d 951 (1931)
 

IN RE MURRAY

Patent Appeal No. 2730.

49 F.2d 951 (1931)

In re MURRAY.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

May 25, 1931.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Milans & Milans, of Washington, D. C. (Usina & Rauber, of New York City, of counsel), for appellant.

T. A. Hostetler, of Washington, D. C. (Howard S. Miller, of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for Commissioner of Patents.

Before GRAHAM, Presiding Judge, and BLAND, HATFIELD, GARRETT, and LENROOT, Associate Judges.

BLAND, Associate Judge.

Appellant has appealed to this court from a decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office, affirming the decision of the Examiner, refusing to allow all the claims in his application, which are numbered 10 to 13, inclusive.

The alleged invention relates to heat-conducting tubes in steam boiler construction.

Claims 10 and 13 are illustrative, and follow:

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases