1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 44 F.2d
  5. 44 F.2d 873 (1930)
 

IN RE HOLST

Patent Appeal No. 2539.

44 F.2d 873 (1930)

In re HOLST.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

December 1, 1930.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Langner, Perry, Card & Langner, of New York City (Thomas Ewing, of New York City, and E. F. Wenderoth, of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for appellant.

T. A. Hostetler, of Washington, D. C. (Howard S. Miller, of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for Commissioner of Patents.

Before GRAHAM, Presiding Judge, and BLAND, HATFIELD, GARRETT, and LENROOT, Associate Judges.

GARRETT, Associate Judge.

This is an appeal from a decision of the Board of Appeals of the Patent Office affirming a decision of the examiner in which he held unpatentable, in view of the prior art, all claims of appellant's application for patent for alleged "improvements in or relating to `electric discharge tubes with two or more electrodes.'"

The claims were twelve in number, but appellant, before us, files a withdrawal of Nos. 2, 3, 6, 8, 9, 10, and 12...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases