1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 41 F.2d
  5. 41 F.2d 855 (1930)
 

GREEN v. HART

No. 2044.

41 F.2d 855 (1930)

GREEN v. HART et al.

District Court, D. Connecticut.

March 13, 1930.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Spellacy, Wholean & Yeomans, of Hartford, Conn., for petitioner.

Kirkham, Cooper, Hungerford & Camp, of New Britain, Conn. (Carlos Richardson, of New Britain, Conn., of counsel), for respondents.

BURROWS, District Judge.

This matter comes to the court on a rule to show cause why the respondents should not be enjoined from seizing slot machines of the petitioner. The motion to dismiss is denied.

The parties are at issue on allegations of the petitioner that the machines in question are not gambling devices under sections 6476 and 6477 of the General Statutes of the state, prohibiting the keeping or possession of such devices when "used for gaming" or...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases