1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 36 F.2d
  5. 36 F.2d 834 (1930)
 

ARNOLD v. LANGMUIR

Patent Appeal No. 2188.

36 F.2d 834 (1930)

ARNOLD v. LANGMUIR.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

January 13, 1930.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

F. T. Woodward and R. R. Adams, both of New York City, and Elmer V. Briggs, for appellant.

Charles E. Tullar, of Schenectady, N. Y. (Harry E. Dunham, of Schenectady, N. Y., of counsel), for appellee.

Before GRAHAM, Presiding Judge, and BLAND, HATFIELD, GARRETT, and LENROOT, Associate Judges.

GRAHAM, Presiding Judge.

Interference proceedings were instituted in the Patent Office between the appellant, Harold D. Arnold, and the appellee, Irving Langmuir. The subject-matter of the interference is contained in twelve counts, three of which are typical and which are as follows:

"1. An oscillation generator comprising a resonant circuit for determining the frequency supplied by said generator; a load circuit adapted to be energized by said generator...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases