WIREBOUNDS PATENTS CO. v. SARANAC AUTOMATIC MACH. CORP.

No. 5076.

37 F.2d 830 (1930)

WIREBOUNDS PATENTS CO. et al. v. SARANAC AUTOMATIC MACH. CORPORATION.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

January 25, 1930.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Laurence A. Janney, of Chicago, Ill. (Emery, Booth, Janney & Varney, of Boston, Mass., and A. Trevor Jones, of Chicago, Ill., on the brief), for appellants.

Howard M. Cox, of Chicago, Ill., and A. C. Paul, of Minneapolis, Minn. (Cheever & Cox, of Chicago, Ill., on the brief), for appellee.

Before DENISON, MACK, and KNAPPEN, Circuit Judges.


DENISON, Circuit Judge.

Infringement suit, based upon three patents issued February 9, 1915, to Inwood and Lavenberg, numbered 1,128,144, 1,128,145, and 1,128,252, and covering respectively: An apparatus, called the "workholder," used in or in connection with a wirebound box blank machine; an organized box blank machine for applying binding wire to assembled box parts; and a method of making wirebound boxes. The first and second were based upon copending applications...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases