1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 59 F.2d
  5. 59 F.2d 780 (1930)
 

A. B. DICK CO. v. SHALLCROSS CO.

59 F.2d 780 (1930)

A. B. DICK CO. v. SHALLCROSS CO.

District Court, S. D. New York.

January 7, 1930.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Archibald Cox, of New York City, for plaintiff.

Otto Munk, of New York City, for defendant.

COXE, District Judge.

In Dick Co. v. Simplicator Corp'n (C. C. A.) 34 F.2d 935, 937, it was held that the Hill invention was a substantial advance over the prior art, in that it provided a coating "dispensing with the necessity of temporary moistening of the stencil sheet during the stencilysing operation" and made possible a sheet "at all times ready for use by inserting the same in a writing machine and typing thereon." The main...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases