1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 40 F.2d
  5. 40 F.2d 769 (1930)
 

PIERSON v. BECK

Patent Appeal No. 2340.

40 F.2d 769 (1930)

PIERSON v. BECK.

Court of Customs of Patent Appeals.

May 28, 1930.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Eakin & Avery, of Akron, Ohio (Parker Dodge, of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for appellant.

Whittemore, Hulbert, Whittemore & Belknap, of Detroit, Mich. (Clarence B. Zewadski, of Detroit, Mich., of counsel), for appellee.

Before GRAHAM, Presiding Judge, and BLAND, HATFIELD, GARRETT, and LENROOT, Associate Judges.

HATFIELD, Associate Judge.

This is an appeal in an interference proceeding from the decision of the Board of Appeals reversing the decision of the Examiner of Interferences awarding priority of invention to appellant, Robert M. Pierson.

The invention relates to a door-check specially adapted for use on automobile doors. It is sufficiently described in the count of the issue, which reads:

"The combination with a swinging door and its frame of a flexible...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases