1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 37 F.2d
  5. 37 F.2d 761 (1930)
 

JUNG v. SCHOLL

Patent Appeal No. 2203.

37 F.2d 761 (1930)

JUNG v. SCHOLL.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

February 6, 1930.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Murray & Zugelter, of Cincinnati, Ohio (Frank L. Zugelter, of Cincinnati, Ohio, of counsel), for appellant.

Charles W. Hills, of Chicago, Ill. (A. C. Mabee and Myron G. Clear, both of Chicago, Ill., of counsel), for appellee.

Before GRAHAM, Presiding Judge, and BLAND, HATFIELD, GARRETT, and LENROOT, Associate Judges.

BLAND, Associate Judge.

Appeal is here taken from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the Patent Office, awarding priority of invention to William M. Scholl.

The subject-matter of the invention is a brace or support, referred to as a "metatarsal arch support" for treatment of foot troubles, such as weak or fallen arches. The device comprises an annular band of elastic or webbing for encircling the human foot between...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases