1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 39 F.2d
  5. 39 F.2d 746 (1930)
 

GRANITEVILLE MFG. CO. v. UNITED STATES

No. H-288.

39 F.2d 746 (1930)

GRANITEVILLE MFG. CO. v. UNITED STATES.

Court of Claims.

April 7, 1930.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Miller & Chevalier, of Washington, D. C., for plaintiff.

Charles R. Pollard, of Washington, D. C., and Herman J. Galloway, Asst. Atty. Gen. (Ralph E. Smith, of Washington, D. C., on the brief), for the United States.

Before BOOTH, Chief Justice, and GRAHAM, GREEN, LITTLETON, and WILLIAMS, Judges.

LITTLETON, Judge.

The question involved in this case is the same as that decided by the court in Riverside & Dan River Cotton Mills, Inc., v. United States, 37 F.2d 965, decided February 10, 1930.

The plaintiff contends that the deficiencies assessed for 1917 and 1919 were "additional assessments made under" the revenue act of 1926 within the meaning of section 1116 of that act...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases