IN RE BERNARD & KATZ

No. 149.

38 F.2d 40 (1930)

In re BERNARD & KATZ, Inc. KNOWLES v. RITTER et al.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

February 3, 1930.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

C. Edward Benoit, of New York City (Julius J. Abeson, of New York City, of counsel), for appellant.

Lesser Bros. and Nathaniel Choloney, all of New York City (William Lesser, of New York City, of counsel), for appellees.

Before L. HAND, SWAN, and MACK, Circuit Judges.


SWAN, Circuit Judge (after stating the facts as above).

The trustee's first contention is that the assignments were invalid to the extent of $5,500, because there was no "present consideration" therefor, within the meaning of section 67d of the Bankruptcy Act (11 USCA § 107(d). It was the practice of the parties, in computing the amount to be advanced upon the accounts assigned as collateral for such advance, to appraise the accounts at 92 per cent. of their...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases