1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 37 F.2d
  5. 37 F.2d 725 (1930)
 

HUGHES v. E. I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS & CO.

No. 12102.

37 F.2d 725 (1930)

HUGHES et al. v. E. I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS & CO.

District Court, E. D. Pennsylvania.

February 7, 1930.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Owen J. Roberts, of Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiffs.

Abel Klaw and Thomas Stokes (of Pepper, Bodine, Stokes & Schoch), both of Philadelphia, Pa., for defendant.

DICKINSON, District Judge.

This is the case of a directed verdict. The facts are not in dispute. The analogue is in consequence that of a special verdict of the jury finding the facts and asking the trial court to mold the verdict for the plaintiff or for the defendant as the law arising out of the facts as found dictates. The court accordingly directed a verdict for the plaintiff. The question thus becomes one of law as if upon a case stated.

An outline fact...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases