1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 44 F.2d
  5. 44 F.2d 685 (1930)
 

UNITED STATES HOFFMAN MACH. CORP. v. PANTEX PRESSING MACH.

Nos. 4334, 4375.

44 F.2d 685 (1930)

UNITED STATES HOFFMAN MACHINERY CORPORATION v. PANTEX PRESSING MACH., Inc. PANTEX PRESSING MACH., Inc., v. UNITED STATES HOFFMAN MACHINERY CORPORATION.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

November 11, 1930.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William G. Mahaffy, of Wilmington, Del. (Charles Neave and Maxwell Barus, both of New York City, of counsel), for United States Hoffman Machinery Corporation.

Ward & Gray, of Wilmington, Del. (Thomas G. Haight, of Jersey City, N. J., Odin Roberts, of Boston, Mass., and J. Granville Meyers, T. J. Johnston, and Charles S. Jones, all of New York City, of counsel), for Pantex Pressing Mach., Inc.

Before BUFFINGTON and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and JOHNSON, District Judge.

DAVIS, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a decree of the District Court holding claims 2 and 5 of United States letters patent No. 1,193,093 valid and infringed and claims 2 and 4 of United States letters patent No. 1,326,982 invalid for want of invention.

Patent No. 1,193,093, issued to Benjamin Weinberger August 1, 1916, relates to improvements in garment-pressing machines, and more particularly to an air-suction drier to a garment press, which consists...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases