1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 47 F.2d
  5. 47 F.2d 666 (1930)
 

ELECTRO BLEACHING GAS CO. v. PARADON MFG. CO.

47 F.2d 666 (1930)

ELECTRO BLEACHING GAS CO. et al. v. PARADON MFG. CO. et al.

District Court, D. New Jersey.

October 29, 1930.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arthur T. Vanderbilt, of Newark, N. J., and Loren N. Wood, of New York City, for complainants.

Alexander T. Schenck, of Newark, N. J., and Lawrence Bristol, of New York City, for defendants.

FAKE, District Judge.

This action is instituted for the purpose of restraining defendants from contributory infringement of a United States process patent, No. 1,142,361, issued to complainant Electro Bleaching Gas Company, as assignor of one George Ornstein. Under this patent the complainant Wallace & Tiernen Company, Inc., operate as exclusive licensees. Defendants contend that the patent is invalid because the claims set out in the letters patent, or material...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases