1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 40 F.2d
  5. 40 F.2d 659 (1930)
 

BTESH v. ROYAL INS. CO.

40 F.2d 659 (1930)

BTESH et al. v. ROYAL INS. CO., LIMITED, OF LIVERPOOL.

District Court, S. D. New York.

May 14, 1930.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Burlingham, Veeder, Fearey, Clark & Hupper, of New York City (Ray Rood Allen, of New York City, of counsel), for libelants.

Mortimer L. Shuford, of New York City, for respondent.

WOOLSEY, District Judge.

That part of the libelants' claim which involves loss of a case of silk goods is dismissed.

The libelants will be allowed to recover for the loss of the case of cotton goods.

The libel herein is brought on two insurance certificates, New York to Mexico City, dated November 11, 1926, issued by libelants under a floating policy which they had with respondent, to cover goods shipped by them on the steamship Cauto to Mexico.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases