1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 44 F.2d
  5. 44 F.2d 631 (1930)
 

CINCINNATI & SUBURBAN BELL TELEPHONE CO. v. BROWN

No. 705.

44 F.2d 631 (1930)

CINCINNATI & SUBURBAN BELL TELEPHONE CO. v. BROWN et al.

District Court, S. D. Ohio, W. D.

October 13, 1930.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

J. W. Heintzman and James N. Ramsey, both of Cincinnati, Ohio, for plaintiff.

Allen & Allen, of Cincinnati, Ohio, for defendants.

NEVIN, District Judge.

The court is of the opinion that under the circumstances a preliminary injunction should issue. I do not think that this situation is comparable with clubs, establishments, etc., having their own lists of addresses and telephone numbers and I do not think it is comparable with the Williams Directory. I think it is a matter of common knowledge that a canvasser for the Williams Directory gets the names of everybody in the house, their residence...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases