1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 38 F.2d
  5. 38 F.2d 630 (1930)
 

C. O. TINGLEY & CO. v. BADGER RUBBER WORKS

No. 4260.

38 F.2d 630 (1930)

C. O. TINGLEY & CO. et al. v. BADGER RUBBER WORKS.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

February 28, 1930.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Russell M. Everett, of New York City, for appellants.

Franklin G. Neal, of Springfield, Mass., for appellee.

Before ALSCHULER, EVANS, and PAGE, Circuit Judges.

ALSCHULER, Circuit Judge.

Following our opinion in this cause remanding it to the District Court for hearing upon its merits [26 F.2d 159], it was there heard, and the bill was dismissed for want of equity.

The device of the patent was sufficiently described in our opinion on the former appeal. The record sufficiently shows a prior art and practice, in the light of which there was no patentable advance in applying to tire...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases