PER CURIAM.
While the facts of course are different, the principle involved in Bok v. McCaughn (C. C. A.) 42 F.2d 616, is decisive of this
42 F.2d 619 (1930)
MUTUAL AID & BENEFIT ASSOCIATION OF FORSTMANN & HUFFMANN EMPLOYEES, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
July 21, 1930.
July 21, 1930.
Wall, Haight, Carey & Hartpence, of Jersey City, N. J. (Thomas G. Haight, of Jersey City, N. J., and Robert H. Montgomery, of Washington, D. C., of counsel) for petitioner.
G. A. Youngquist, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Sewall Key and Harvey R. Gamble, Sp. Asst. Attys. Gen. (Harvey R. Gamble, Gen. Counsel, Bureau of Internal Revenue, and Joe S. Franklin, Sp. Atty., Bureau of Internal Revenue, both of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for respondent.
Before BUFFINGTON and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and AVIS, District Judge.
PER CURIAM.
While the facts of course are different, the principle involved in Bok v. McCaughn (C. C. A.) 42 F.2d 616, is decisive of this
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
Comment
User Comments