WILLIAM LANE, INC. v. SELBY SHOE CO.

No. 73.

45 F.2d 581 (1930)

WILLIAM LANE, Inc., v. SELBY SHOE CO. et al.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

December 1, 1930.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hirsh, Newman, Reass & Becker and Daniel G. Rosenblatt, all of New York City (Benjamin Reass, of New York City, of counsel), for appellant.

Hoguet & Neary, of New York City, and Thomas G. Haight, of Jersey City, N. J., for appellees.

Before L. HAND, SWAN, and CHASE, Circuit Judges.


PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff sued the defendant at law for infringement of its patent, and both parties stipulated in writing to try the cause before the District Judge. He directed judgment for the defendant, which the defendant entered without preparing any findings of fact. The plaintiff's time to appeal expired, and at the same time the period within which the judgment might be vacated under general rule 5 of the District Court for the Southern District of New York...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases