1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 41 F.2d
  5. 41 F.2d 542 (1930)
 

BROWN v. SHIELDS & CO.

Nos. 3099, 3584.

41 F.2d 542 (1930)

BROWN v. SHIELDS & CO., Inc., et al. (two cases.)

District Court, D. Massachusetts.

May 22, 1930.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

In case No. 3099:

Hale & Dorr and D. Burstein, all of Boston, Mass., for plaintiff.

Warren, Garfield, Whiteside & Lamson, Richard M. Russell, and Edward C. Mack, Jr., all of Boston, Mass., for defendant Shields & Co.

In case No. 3584:

Hale & Dorr, of Boston, Mass., for plaintiff.

Edward C. Mack, Jr., Warren, Garfield, Whiteside & Lamson, and Richard M. Russell, all of Boston, Mass., for defendant.

MORTON, District Judge.

There are two pleas in abatement in each case, the first denying jurisdiction under the service of the original writ issued by the state court, the other, under the special precept issued by this court. The facts are settled by stipulations, and for present purposes are the same in each case.

Service of the original writ was made by the Suffolk sheriff under date of February 11, 1929. His return shows a trustee attachment on the Federal...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases