1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 39 F.2d
  5. 39 F.2d 494 (1930)
 

HARLAN v. BREGMAN

Patent Appeal No. 2264.

39 F.2d 494 (1930)

HARLAN v. BREGMAN et al.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

April 10, 1930.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George E. Mueller, of Chicago, Ill., for appellant.

Watts T. Estabrook, of Washington, D. C., and Kwis, Hudson & Kent, of Cleveland, Ohio (A. J. Hudson, of Cleveland, Ohio, of counsel), for appellees.

Before GRAHAM, Presiding Judge, and BLAND, HATFIELD, GARRETT, and LENROOT, Associate Judges.

GARRETT, Associate Judge.

The two parties before us in this case claim to have invented a certain type of toy telephone. An interference was declared by the Examiner April 10, 1925. A third party, Harold D. Allen, was involved in the interference so declared and in the subsequent proceedings in the Patent Office, but no appeal was taken by him from the decision of the Commissioner, so the contest before us is between Harlan and Bregman.

The counts in issue...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases