1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 39 F.2d
  5. 39 F.2d 468 (1930)
 

RUSH v. OURSLER

39 F.2d 468 (1930)

RUSH et al. v. OURSLER et al. FAYDER et al. v. LEWIS et al.

District Court, S. D. New York.

March 28, 1930.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hayes & Uihlein, of New York City (Ben A. Matthews, James V. Hayes and Morgan J. O'Brien, 2nd., all of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiffs Rush and Hagen.

Joseph Sterling, of New York City, for plaintiffs Fayder and Kane.

O'Brien, Malevinsky & Driscoll, of New York City (Arthur F. Driscoll and Benjamin Pepper, both of New York City, of counsel), for defendants Lewis and Harris.

Hays, St. John & Buckley, of New York City (Arthur Garfield Hays and Alan S. Hays, both of New York City, of counsel), for defendant Oursler.

Paul N. Turner, of New York City, for defendant Brentano.

THACHER, District Judge (after stating the facts as above).

An ordinary observer of the three plays here involved would undoubtedly form the impression that they were of the same type and had utilized the same material — that is, a shooting in a theater and the solution of the crime. But no impartial person would think that anything of importance in "The Spider" had been taken from either of the other two plays. The differences in the plays are more striking...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases