1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 37 F.2d
  5. 37 F.2d 435 (1930)
 

MULHENS & KROPFF v. ONNEN

Patent Appeal No. 2238.

37 F.2d 435 (1930)

MULHENS & KROPFF, Inc., v. ONNEN.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

February 6, 1930.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Emery, Booth, Janney & Varney, of Washington, D. C. (Lucius E. Varney and Edward G. Curtis, both of New York City, and Nichol M. Sandoe, of Boston, Mass., of counsel), for appellant.

John W. Darley, of Baltimore, Md., for appellee.

Before GRAHAM, Presiding Judge, and BLAND, HATFIELD, GARRETT, and LENROOT, Associate Judges.

GARRETT, Associate Judge.

This is an appeal from the decision of the Commissioner of Patents sustaining the action of the Examiner of Trade-Mark Interferences dismissing an opposition filed by Mulhens & Kropff to the application of Onnen for the registration as a trade-mark of the numerals "7-11" applied to certain liquid medicinal preparations, for the treatment of colds, grippe, chills and fever, malaria and biliousness, and for use as a blood builder.

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases