1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 43 F.2d
  5. 43 F.2d 372 (1930)
 

MEAD FIBRE CO. v. UNITED STATES

No. 279.

43 F.2d 372 (1930)

MEAD FIBRE CO. v. UNITED STATES.

District Court, S. D. Ohio, W. D.

July 28, 1930.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

McMahon, Corwin, Landis & Markham, of Dayton, Ohio, for plaintiff.

H. E. Mau, U. S. Dist. Atty., and Frank Hier, Asst. U. S. Dist. Atty., both of Cincinnati, Ohio, and C. M. Charest, Gen. Counsel, Bureau of Internal Revenue, and Herbert S. Fessenden and Wright Matthews, Sp. Attys., Bureau of Internal Revenue, all of Washington, D. C., for the United States.

NEVIN, District Judge.

This is an action at law in which plaintiff prays for judgment against the defendant in the sum of $4,079.11 with interest thereon, for alleged overpayment by plaintiff of income and profits taxes for the fiscal year ending February 28, 1921. By stipulation in writing, entered of record, the respective parties waived trial by a jury and submitted the case to the court for its consideration and determination. The cause came on to be heard before...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases