PER CURIAM.
In these actions for damages for injuries received at a railroad crossing, the jury found for defendant on the common-law counts, but for plaintiffs on the statutory counts. The only question before us is whether there should have been directed verdicts for defendant on these latter counts.
It was the duty of the defendant, under the statutes, to have some one on its engine to maintain a lookout, and when the plaintiffs appeared "upon the road...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
